Sony XBR65X850F vs Sony XBR65X900F

Sony XBR65X850F vs Sony XBR65X900F: get the true media enjoyment

Sony XBR65X850F vs Sony XBR65X900F

The Sony XBR65X850F vs Sony XBR65X900F comparison has started after the presentation of these TVs at the beginning of February 2018. The Sony XBR65X850F is a representative of middle-priced range, while Sony XBR65X900F belongs to the high-priced scope. Devices have LED display technologies, but the last one presented better picture quality. The 4K HDR X1 Extreme processor was implemented in XBR65X900F, while XBR65X850F could boast only a 4K HDR X1.

Article navigation

Picture

Both units could boast great pictures, but nothing is perfect. The Sony XBR65X850F has quite low contrast ratio, so in a dark room, the black seemed gray. The Sony XBR65X900F has not only an amazing native contrast ratio but also the full array local dimming support. Due to these peculiarities, the picture on the 900F series representative looked brighter and more natural. Models have problems with angle views, but Sony XBR65X900F surprised me with better display possibilities. The Sony XBR65X850F had great peak brightness in SDR, but after collation with XBR65X900F, it looked really dimmer.

Features and Performances

The Sony XBR65X850F vs XBR65X900F compare process was really interesting. The first model had an intuitive interface, but due to a great number of inbuilt features, it was hard for me to find something particular. Thankfully, the Google Assistant helped me. I mentioned that after a long working day the unit has started to work very slowly. The second model has very specific Android TV interface, which I had to explore during the testing period. Very long home screen contained a lot of information and it was uneasy to perform the seeking. The Sony remote and the voice control peculiarity helped me control the TV.

Build Quality and Design

The visual Sony XBR65X900F vs XBR65X850F comparison showed me, that both models had long legs. The bottom part heated up very quickly unlike the XBR65X850F. The borders of X850F were a little bit thicker than X900F. Despite the fact that both TVs are made from plastic the build quality was high. Nothing bad happened with its corps during the whole testing.

Due to the fact, that mentioned models have different backlight technologies, their thickness was different. The 86SJ9570 has Edge LED, so a very thin matrix has caused the corresponding subtlety of TV itself. Thanks to the Direct LED, the 86UK6570PUB has more presentable screen dimensions. I have no complaints about the build quality of both units.

Sony XBR65X850F Pros & Cons

PROS:

  • The presence of a parental control was really useful.
  • Bluetooth audio streaming was performed perfectly.
  • The post-calibration process balanced the color greatly.

CONS:

  • The black uniformity was awful.
  • The high volume produced some annoying cracklings.

Sony XBR65X900F Pros & Cons

PROS:

  • Sony’s Android TV had no ads.
  • The response time was quick.
  • The smooth looking motion was very natural.

CONS:

  • It appeared a distortion at low volumes.
  • Rubber chunk buttons on the remote controller were low-quality.

Sony XBR65X850F
Sony XBR65X850F review

Sep 21, 2018

Sony XBR65X850F’s IPS panel provides the high-quality image and natural colors. A strong point in Sony XBR65X850F specs is 6.0 Google Android ops system that features about 40 various apps. The...

Read More

Add TV to compare

We didn't find anything to show here
Votes 3 3
Rating 4 4

Common

Product

Sony XBR65X850F
Sony XBR65X900F

Model

XBR65X850F
XBR65X900F

Brand

Sony
Sony

Rating

4.0 of 5
4.2 of 5

Reviews

19
71

General

Series

X850F
X900F

Screen sizes in series

65, 75, 85
49, 55, 65, 75, 85

Display

Screen size, inch

65
65

4K/HDR

Full HD

Resolution, pixels

3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160

Display type

IPS
LCD

Screen design

flat
flat

Display width, cm/in

142,85/56,24
142,85/56,24

Display height, cm/in

80,35/31,63
80,35/31,63

Display area, %

94,69
95,69

Display colors

1.07 billion
1.07 billion

Refresh rate, Hz

120
120

Aspect ratio

16:9
16:9

High dynamic range (HDR)

HDR10
HDR10

3D

3D

2D to 3D

has not
has not

Video file formats

AVI

WMV

MP4

MOV

Other

MKV, WebM, M2TS
MKV, WebM, M2TS

Video file codecs

DivX

H.265

H.264

H.263

MPEG-4

Other

QuickTime, Xvid
QuickTime, Xvid

Viewing angles

Horizontal, degrees

178
178

Vertical, degrees

178
178

Audio

Speakers

stereo
stereo

Speakers power, W

20
20

Dolby atmos

Dolby surround

DTS decoder

Audio file formats

MP3

WMA

WAV

AAC

AC3

FLAC

OGG

Other

MIDI, M4A, LPCM
MIDI, M4A, LPCM

Dimensions, weight and color

Colors

black
black

Width, cm/in

145/57,08
144,7/56,96

Height, cm/in

83,6/32,91
82,9/32,63

Depth, cm/in

5,2/2,04
6,9/2,71

Weight, kg/lbs

25,6/56,44
24,5/54

Width with stand, cm/in

145/57,08
144,7/56,96

Height with stand, cm/in

90/35,43
89,8/35,35

Depth with stand, cm/in

31,5/12,4
29,7/11,69

Weight with stand, kg/lbs

26,5/58,42
25,5/56,22

Connections

HDMI

4
4

USB

3
3

Component video input

0
0

Composite video input

1
1

VGA input

0
0

Optical digital audio output (S/PDIF)

1
1

Analog audio output (3.5 mm)

1
1

Ethernet (RJ45)

1
1

Wi-Fi

Wi-Fi 5GHz

Bluetooth

TV tuner

Analog

Digital

Ergonomics

VESA mount

VESA interface

300 x 300
300 x 300

Removable stand

Landscape/Portrait pivot

Accessories

Camera

Microphone

Internet movie streaming

Netflix

Hulu

Amazon video

HBO

Other

Vudu
Vudu

Features

Remote control

Smart TV

Local dimming

Bluetooth audio streaming

Voice remote

Picture in picture

MHL-compatible

Parental control

Artificial Intelligence

Google assistant

Amazon alexa compatible

Mobile features

Mobile App

Recording features

Digital recording

Watch and record

Panel

Panel technology

Motionflow XR
Motionflow XR

Backlight technology

Edge LED
Direct LED

Manufacturer

VA
VA

Native refresh rate, Hz

120
240

Panel bit depth, bits

10
10

Pixel pitch, cm/in

0,037/0,014
0,037/0,014

Pixel density, ppi

68
68

Processor

Model

ARM Cortex-A53, Quad-core
ARM Cortex-A53, Quad-core

Operating system

Operating system

Android TV
Android 7,0 Nougat, Android 8,0 Oreo

Power

Power supply, V

100 - 120
100 - 120

Typical power consumption, W

150

Maximum power consumption, W

196
271

Standby power consumption, W

0,5
0,5

Sony XBR65X850F overview

Sony XBR65X900F overview

TVs comparison rating

  • better
  • worse
  • 30
  • 35.5
  • 30Sony XBR65X850F
  • 35.5Sony XBR65X900F

The best TV is Sony XBR65X900F. Check Sony XBR65X900F price at Amazon