Televisions Comparison: Hitachi 55R80 vs TOSHIBA TF-32A710U21

Compare detailed specifications, side-by-side differences, verified user reviews, and buying recommendations to help you make the right choice.

Hitachi 55R80

Hitachi 55R80

  • Brand Hitachi
  • Aspect Ratio 16:9
  • Display Type VA
  • SCREEN DESIGN flat
  • SMART TV true
TOSHIBA TF-32A710U21

TOSHIBA TF-32A710U21

  • Brand TOSHIBA
  • Aspect Ratio 16:9
  • Display Type LCD
  • SCREEN DESIGN flat
  • SMART TV TRUE

Quick Verdict: Which One Should You Choose?

Deciding between the Hitachi 55R80 and the TOSHIBA TF-32A710U21 depends on your available space, storage capacity goals, and everyday usage style:

Best For Maximum Capacity

Hitachi 55R80

Designed for large households, bulk grocery shoppers, and long-term storage where total cubic feet is the highest priority.

  • Superior Volume: Easily stores bulk meats, frozen garden harvests, and family packs.
  • Cold Retention: Keeps food frozen significantly longer in power outages.
  • Energy Efficiency: Top-opening design keeps dense cold air trapped inside.
Best For Compact Spaces

TOSHIBA TF-32A710U21

Ideal for apartments, offices, dorms, or secondary kitchen use where space efficiency and neat organization are paramount.

  • Space-Saving Footprint: Fits neatly under counters or in compact corners without intruding.
  • Upright Organization: Shelves allow you to organize and grab items without digging.
  • Everyday Convenience: Front-swing door provides quick, easy access anytime.

Specifications

Specification Hitachi 55R80 TOSHIBA TF-32A710U21
Video File Formats
AVI Yes Yes
Other MKV, TS —
MOV No No
MP4 Yes Yes
WMV Yes Yes
Artificial Intelligence
Google Assistant No Yes
Apple AirPlay — Yes
Amazon Alexa Compatible No Yes
Video File Codecs
H.263 Yes —
H.264 Yes —
H.265 No —
DivX Yes —
Other MKV, TS —
MPEG-4 Yes —
Panel
Panel Bit Depth, Bits — —
Native Refresh Rate, Hz 120 —
Backlight Technology Direct LED —
Panel Technology — —
Pixel Density, Ppi 80 —
Pixel Pitch, Cm/in 0.031/0.012 —
Audio
Dolby Surround No —
Dolby Atmos No —
Speakers Power, W 16 —
Speakers stereo Build in
DTS Decoder No —
Audio File Formats
OGG No —
FLAC Yes —
AC3 Yes —
AAC Yes —
WAV Yes —
WMA Yes —
MP3 Yes —
Other MKV, TS —
Dimensions, Weight And Color
Height With Stand, Cm/in 76.2/30 —
Width With Stand, Cm/in 122.8/48.34 —
Weight, Kg/lbs 18.2/40.12 —
Depth, Cm/in 7.6/3.1 —
Height, Cm/in 71.1/28 —
Width, Cm/in 122.8/48.34 —
Colors black black
Weight With Stand, Kg/lbs 19.1/42.11 —
Depth With Stand, Cm/in 26.9/10.6 —
Connections
WI-FI Yes No
Ethernet (RJ45) — 1
Analog Audio Output (3.5 Mm) 1 1
VGA Input — —
Optical Digital Audio Output (S/PDIF) 1 —
Component Video Input — No
Composite Video Input 1 1
USB 1 1
Bluetooth No No
Wi-Fi 5GHz Yes No
Display
Display Height, Cm/in 68.04/26.78 17.2/43.8
Display Width, Cm/in 120.96/47.62 28.8/73.2
8K/UHD — No
SCREEN DESIGN flat flat
Display Type VA LCD
High Dynamic Range (HDR) No —
Resolution, Pixels 3840 x 2160 720
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Full HD Yes No
Refresh Rate, Hz 120 60
4K/UHD Yes No
Display Colors — —
Screen Size, Inch 55 31.5
Display Area, % 93.12 —
Ergonomics
Landscape/Portrait Pivot No No
Removable Stand Yes Yes
VESA Interface 200 x 200 —
VESA Mount Yes —
Internet Movie Streaming
Other MKV, TS —
HBO Yes Yes
Amazon Video Yes Yes
Hulu Yes Yes
Netflix Yes Yes
3d
2D To 3D has not No
3D No —
Recording Features
Watch And Record No —
Digital Recording No —
Viewing Angles
Vertical, Degrees 178 178
Horizontal, Degrees 178 178
Tv Tuner
Digital Yes —
Analog Yes —
Processor
Model Dual-core —
Mobile Features
Mobile App Yes —
Accessories
Microphone No —
Camera No No
General
Screen Sizes In Series 49, 55 32,43
SMART TV Yes Yes
Display Type VA LCD
Brand Hitachi TOSHIBA
Video Features
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Unique Features
VOICE REMOTE Yes Yes
In The Box
REMOTE CONTROL Yes Yes

Popular Comparison

versus
Sony KD43X80J

Sony KD43X

Sony KD43X80J

Samsung QN

versus
Samsung UN55MU6290

Samsung UN

Samsung UN55MU6290

Samsung UN

versus
Sony XBR55X850D

Sony XBR55

Sony XBR55X850D

Sony XBR55

versus
LG 55UJ6200

LG 55UJ620

LG 55UJ6200

LG 55UJ630

versus
Samsung 55NU8000

Samsung 55

Samsung 55NU8000

Sony XBR55

Frequently Asked Questions

The main differences center around storage capacity, form factor, and convenience. The Hitachi 55R80 provides extensive bulk storage capacity best suited for homes, garages, or basements needing deep freeze space. In contrast, the TOSHIBA TF-32A710U21 offers a compact upright design that fits into smaller spaces with convenient shelf organization.

Chest-style freezers generally excel in thermal efficiency because cold air naturally settles at the bottom and does not escape when the lid is lifted. Compact upright models have lower total kilowatt-hour usage simply due to their smaller cubic volume, making both designs efficient for their respective intended purposes.

Both products are available through official brand stores and authorized retailers with full manufacturer warranties and fast delivery options. Click the "Check Best Price" buttons in the comparison cards above to view today's latest promotions, official deals, and current availability.

Measure your available floor clearance first. If you have open space in a garage, basement, or utility room and want to freeze items in bulk, choose the Hitachi 55R80. If you have limited room in a kitchen, apartment, dorm, or office and prefer easy eye-level access to items, choose the TOSHIBA TF-32A710U21.