Oct 16, 2018
I’ve already managed to test one of the most controversial receivers in the market — Marantz SR5013 and I decided to write this Marantz SR5013 review in order to make your life easier. I ...Read More
Marantz SR5013 vs Denon AVRX3400H are pretty much like twins, it takes a few glances to recognize the difference even if you are an advanced user. SR5013 is newer hence the higher price point, making my research I have found many differences.
Read on to find the best value for your family. Denon has been holding a firm position on the market with AVRX3400H but now Marantz is coming to take the spot and win over all customers. The recognizable audio formats are similar, both AV receivers recognize the most popular formats like MP3, AAC, DSD, FLAC, WAV, and WMA. Plus Marantz also plays AIFF and Apple lossless.
The built-in decoders are also very similar. Marantz SR5013 vs Denon AVRX3400H has a Dolby surround. Although Dolby True HD, Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus, DTX:X, DTS neural:X, and DTS-HD master audio are foreseen in both of the receivers.
Other specs are also pretty similar, for example, Marantz SR5013 vs AVRX3400H power consumption is 650 W versus 600 W.
Denon AVRX3400H vs SR5013 has way fewer input options. Although both have Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and IEEE 802.3 and 802.3u. Also, these two receivers both have a 3D and an HDMI passthrough.
If you compare the connector types, you will see they also similar, both have 1 USB, 1 phone, 2 Subwoofer outputs, 8 HDMI inputs, 2 HDMI outputs, SR5013 has 8 AV inputs and AVRX3400H has 2 AV inputs.
Both receivers are symmetrical, matte black with black displays and fluorescent white lettering. Denon has a rectangular display while Marantz has a stylish round eyehole display. These receivers will look cool as a part of your home cinema, the minimalistic composition is meant to work with any interior.
The Marantz SR5013 is better receiver in this comparison. Check Marantz SR5013 price