Sep 27, 2018
If you choose to buy this AV receiver you will definitely have no regrets as this receiver can act like a digital player, network audio player or internet radio. If you are worried about how it can c...Read More
Marantz NR1606 vs Marantz NR1608 – is the comparison of 2 middle-class AVs with the same total output power of 350W. Is it rational to pay more for 1606 and to save energy due to its lower power consumption or it is better to pay less for 1608 and to lose DTS:X format for optimum sound allocation?
The test Marantz NR1606 vs NR1608 indicated that they are great AVs for small and medium spaces and speakers with high sensitivity. They create high-quality sound with the extra speakers, a pair of subs, and front speakers. Marantz NR1606’s onboard 4K upscaler provides the perfect viewing experience and the compatibility with such 4K/HDR units as PS4, TV, record player, etc. This device sounds better in DTS than in Dolby. As for the power per channel, there is nothing to compare – both units give 50W (not too much but enough for the small room).
While checking Marantz NR1608 vs Marantz NR1606, one issue just went outside – both units have only 1 HDMI output that makes impossible to use the TV and projector at the same time. Marantz NR1606 has Audyssey Bronze calibration system with MultEQ that has thorough instructions for the fast and convenient room correction. Marantz NR1608’s calibration is easy too but demands plenty of measurements.
Comparing Marantz NR1608 vs NR1606, their dimensions should be mentioned. Marantz NR1606 and NR 1608’s design is top-notch and a compact form factor makes these AVs very convenient components for the home systems. The low height allows them to fit the TV console well with room to breathe. Marantz NR1608 has 1 HDMI input on the front panel to connect any compatible device in a minute. Marantz NR1606’s buttons seem to shine too bright.
Marantz NR1608 is better receiver in this comparison. Check Marantz NR1608 price