Wi-Fi Routers Comparison: TP-Link Archer AX11000 vs Netgear RS400

Compare detailed specifications, side-by-side differences, verified user reviews, and buying recommendations to help you make the right choice.

TP-Link Archer AX11000

TP-Link Archer AX11000

  • Brand TP-Link
  • APP CONTROL TRUE
  • Width (inch) 11.34
  • Height (inch) 7.24
  • Weight (lbs) 2.64
Netgear RS400

Netgear RS400

  • Brand Netgear
  • APP CONTROL TRUE
  • Width (inch) 7.26
  • Height (inch) 1.97
  • Weight (lbs) 1.7

Quick Verdict: Which One Should You Choose?

Deciding between the TP-Link Archer AX11000 and the Netgear RS400 depends on your available space, storage capacity goals, and everyday usage style:

Best For Maximum Capacity

TP-Link Archer AX11000

Designed for large households, bulk grocery shoppers, and long-term storage where total cubic feet is the highest priority.

  • Superior Volume: Easily stores bulk meats, frozen garden harvests, and family packs.
  • Cold Retention: Keeps food frozen significantly longer in power outages.
  • Energy Efficiency: Top-opening design keeps dense cold air trapped inside.
Best For Compact Spaces

Netgear RS400

Ideal for apartments, offices, dorms, or secondary kitchen use where space efficiency and neat organization are paramount.

  • Space-Saving Footprint: Fits neatly under counters or in compact corners without intruding.
  • Upright Organization: Shelves allow you to organize and grab items without digging.
  • Everyday Convenience: Front-swing door provides quick, easy access anytime.

Specifications

Specification TP-Link Archer AX11000 Netgear RS400
Network
IIIrd Band Data Rate Wi-Fi 6, 2.4 GHz, upto to 1148 mbps No
IInd Band Data Rate Wi-Fi 6, 5 GHz, upto to 4804 mbps Wi-Fi 5, 5 GHz, upto to 1625 mbps
Ist Band Data Rate Wi-Fi 6, 5 GHz, upto to 4804 mbps Wi-Fi 5, 2.4 GHz, upto to 600 mbps
Backward Compatibility 802.11ax/ac/n/a/b/g 802.11ac, 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n
IVth Band Data Rate No No
Power
DC Input Power (V) — —
AC Input Power (V) — —
Physical
Weight (lbs) 2.64 1.7
Lenth (inch) 11.34 11.2
Height (inch) 7.24 1.97
Width (inch) 11.34 7.26
Wireless Features
Virtual Assistant — Yes
APP CONTROL Yes Yes
Supported Protocols IPv4, IPv6 IPv6
Wireless Security WPA, WPA2, WPA3, WPA/WPA2-Enterprise (802.1x) WPA2, DoS, Double Firewall
General
RAM 1 GB 256 MB
Flash Memory 512 MB 128 MB
Processor 1.8 GHz 64 Bit Quad-Core CPU 1GHz dual-core
Wi-Fi Technology Tri-band AX11000 Dual-band- AC2300
Connectivity
MU-MIMO Support Yes Yes
Number Of Antennas 8 x External 3 x Extenal
Ports 8 x LAN, 1 x WAN, 1 x USB-C 3.0, 1 x USB-A 3.0 4 x LAN, 1 x WAN, 2 x USB-Type A

Frequently Asked Questions

The main differences center around storage capacity, form factor, and convenience. The TP-Link Archer AX11000 provides extensive bulk storage capacity best suited for homes, garages, or basements needing deep freeze space. In contrast, the Netgear RS400 offers a compact upright design that fits into smaller spaces with convenient shelf organization.

Chest-style freezers generally excel in thermal efficiency because cold air naturally settles at the bottom and does not escape when the lid is lifted. Compact upright models have lower total kilowatt-hour usage simply due to their smaller cubic volume, making both designs efficient for their respective intended purposes.

Both products are listed on Amazon with full manufacturer warranties, customer reviews, and fast delivery options. Click the "Check Price on Amazon" buttons in the comparison cards above to view today's latest promotions, verified customer ratings, and current availability.

Measure your available floor clearance first. If you have open space in a garage, basement, or utility room and want to freeze items in bulk, choose the TP-Link Archer AX11000. If you have limited room in a kitchen, apartment, dorm, or office and prefer easy eye-level access to items, choose the Netgear RS400.