Headphones & Earbuds Comparison: Philips PH805 vs Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E8 2.0

Compare detailed specifications, side-by-side differences, verified user reviews, and buying recommendations to help you make the right choice.

Philips PH805

Philips PH805

  • Brand Philips
  • BATTERY OPERATED TRUE
  • Bluetooth TRUE
  • Weight (Ounces) 9.8
  • Connectivity (Wired/Wireless) Both
Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E8 2.0

Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E8 2.0

  • Brand Bang & Olufsen
  • BATTERY OPERATED TRUE
  • Bluetooth TRUE
  • Weight (Ounces) 2.01
  • Connectivity (Wired/Wireless) Wireless

Quick Verdict: Which One Should You Choose?

Deciding between the Philips PH805 and the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E8 2.0 depends on your available space, storage capacity goals, and everyday usage style:

Best For Maximum Capacity

Philips PH805

Designed for large households, bulk grocery shoppers, and long-term storage where total cubic feet is the highest priority.

  • Superior Volume: Easily stores bulk meats, frozen garden harvests, and family packs.
  • Cold Retention: Keeps food frozen significantly longer in power outages.
  • Energy Efficiency: Top-opening design keeps dense cold air trapped inside.
Best For Compact Spaces

Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E8 2.0

Ideal for apartments, offices, dorms, or secondary kitchen use where space efficiency and neat organization are paramount.

  • Space-Saving Footprint: Fits neatly under counters or in compact corners without intruding.
  • Upright Organization: Shelves allow you to organize and grab items without digging.
  • Everyday Convenience: Front-swing door provides quick, easy access anytime.

Specifications

Specification Philips PH805 Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E8
General
Foldable — No
Connectivity (Wired/Wireless) Both Wireless
Waterproof — —
Touch Yes Yes
Voice Coil — —
Magnet Neodymium —
Active Noise Cancellation Yes —
Drivers
Driver Size (mm) 40 5.7
Driver Type — Dynamic
Number Of Drivers (per Piece) 1 1
Microphone
Type — Omnidirectional
Beamforming Support — —
Number Of Mics — 1
Built-in Microphone Yes Yes
Connectivity
Audio Cable Length (mm) 3.5 No
Charging Cable Length (m) — 1.25
Multipoint Support Yes Yes
Wireless Range (m) 10 —
Bluetooth Version 5 5.1
Bluetooth Profiles HFP, A2DP, AVRCP —
Supported Audio Codecs SBC SBC, AAC codec, Aptx
Bluetooth Yes Yes
Battery
Charging Port Micro-USB USB Type C
Wireless Charging No Yes
Standby Time (hours) 160 —
Recharge Time (hours) 2 2
BATTERY OPERATED Yes Yes
Audio Performance
Impedance (Ω) 16 16
Total Harmonic Distortion (%) — —
Sensitivity (dB) 90 107
Frequency Response (Hz) 7-40000 20-20000
Others
APP CONTROL — Yes
Voice Assiatant Yes Yes
Amazon Alexa No —
Physical
Weight (Ounces) 9.8 2.01
Dimensions (Inches) 10.55 x 9.25 x 2.87 0.91 x 0.79 x 0.98

Frequently Asked Questions

The main differences center around storage capacity, form factor, and convenience. The Philips PH805 provides extensive bulk storage capacity best suited for homes, garages, or basements needing deep freeze space. In contrast, the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E8 2.0 offers a compact upright design that fits into smaller spaces with convenient shelf organization.

Chest-style freezers generally excel in thermal efficiency because cold air naturally settles at the bottom and does not escape when the lid is lifted. Compact upright models have lower total kilowatt-hour usage simply due to their smaller cubic volume, making both designs efficient for their respective intended purposes.

Both products are available through official brand stores and authorized retailers with full manufacturer warranties and fast delivery options. Click the "Check Best Price" buttons in the comparison cards above to view today's latest promotions, official deals, and current availability.

Measure your available floor clearance first. If you have open space in a garage, basement, or utility room and want to freeze items in bulk, choose the Philips PH805. If you have limited room in a kitchen, apartment, dorm, or office and prefer easy eye-level access to items, choose the Bang & Olufsen Beoplay E8 2.0.