Onkyo TX-NR787 vs Denon AVR-X4400H

Onkyo TX-NR787 vs Denon AVR-X4400H: feel the difference

Onkyo and Denon receivers had different power rates. The operational power consumption for the first one was 750W, while for the second – 710W. Moreover, comparing the Onkyo TX-NR787 vs Denon AVR-X4400H, I want to note about different DSP preset qty. The actual number for TX-NR787 is 4, and for AVR-X4400H – 7.

Features & Performance

Both devices had the same number of preset FM/AM stations (40), but Onkyo presented to me worst signal quality. Some stations were barely heard, moreover, my ears suffered from constant noise. When I decided to compare its radio possibilities with Denon, I found out that the last one receiver had a clearer signal. With the TX-NR787 appeared one more issue: I couldn’t connect my iPhone through AirPlay. Other apps like Spotify didn’t bring me problems, but the receiver refused to cooperate with Apple product. The AVR-X4400H also started to play pranks and the connection was established after the second attempt.

Connections & Setup

When I performed the Onkyo TX-NR787 vs Denon AVR-X4400H specs comparison, I found out an interesting peculiarity: Denon had more inputs and outputs than Onkyo. All of them worked great, except 1 HDMI input in TX-NR787, which didn’t want to accept the cord. The setting process was similar in simplicity, but the Onkyo manufacturers described everything on the screen more clearly.

Design

After quick physical Denon AVR-X4400H vs Onkyo TX-NR787 comparison, it was easy to see that Denon (30.2 pounds) was much heavier than Onkyo (24 pounds). The AVR-X4400H had bigger buttons and volume controls on the front side. Moreover, all the inputs and outputs on the Denon’s rare side were presented in a very unpleasant to eye manner. Meshed pictures distracted and didn’t allow reading the connector’s appointment. The Onkyo had more understandable and well-designed back panel.

Onkyo TX-NR787 Pros & Cons

Denon AVR-X4400H Pros & Cons