Samsung QN65Q6FNA vs Sony XBR65X850F

Samsung QN65Q6FNA vs Sony XBR65X850F: High-quality Picture against Amazing Features

Samsung QN65Q6FNA vs Sony XBR65X850F

The Samsung QN65Q6FNA vs Sony XBR65X850F review shows the brand’s possibilities. Both devices appeared on the market in the 2018 year. The first device belongs to the Q6F series that proposes an Ambient Mode and powerful processors. The second one is perceived as one of the most popular representatives of the X850F series, which has 120Hz native refresh rate and compact dimensions. Samsung is more expensive than Sony.

Article navigation

Picture

The Sony XBR65X850F vs Samsung QN65Q6FNA picture comparison shows that the first model can’t provide a user with a perfect image. There are faded colors and the objects on a screen are blurred. The adjustment doesn’t bring the desired effect. The second model has a very clear picture and the colors are similar to natural. At the same time, the Sony doesn’t have problems with picture reflecting, while Samsung’s screen may become black and bring the picture back in a few seconds.

Features & Performance

The sound volume is one of the most important features I want to compare. Sony has very low sounds and even the maximum volume can’t deafen me. On the Samsung’s unit, it is enough a half of maximum volume possibilities to make me cover my ears. I guess the reason for it is the speaker’s power difference (40W versus 20W). The Sony’s Alexa performs the entire tasks faster than the Samsung’s assistant Bixby.

Design & Build quality

The Samsung QN65Q6FNA is supplemented with a slim brushed metal bezel that gives the unit a very modern look. The Sony XBR65X850F is made of plastic with an aluminum finish and the aesthetic impression is worse. The Samsung’s semi-gloss screen allows reflection minimizing and perceived contrast improving. The XBR65X850F doesn’t have such a peculiarity but it has great SDR and HDR brightness besides the QN65Q6FNA. Both devices are well-constructed and I don’t notice any problems with the build quality.

Samsung QN65Q6FNA Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • The TV doesn’t contain any smearing/trailing in motion or unnatural motion blur while gaming.
  • The small and light remote controller includes a mic, equipped for helping with voice navigation.

Cons:

  • The device is too heavy to mount on the wall.
  • Very annoying advertisements distract from the basic operations.

Sony XBR65X850F Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Due to Samsung’s unit, the gaming on my PS4 Pro and Xbox is really outstanding. The picture is very realistic and there are no performance problems.
  • The initial software/network setup takes a little time and is very easy.

Cons:

  • I see some little blooming/haloing around bright characters and things against a dark background.
  • The picture is pretty grainy and there is no image clarity.

Samsung QN65Q6FNA

Samsung QN65Q6FNA review

Apr 08, 2019

The Samsung QN65Q6FNA is the initial model of the Q family (2018). The Samsung QN65Q6FNA specs provided good work embedded services Samsung. The QN65Q6FNA supports 4K, HDR10 and full-color volume, bu...

Read More
Sony XBR65X850F

Sony XBR65X850F review

Sep 21, 2018

Sony XBR65X850F’s IPS panel provides the high-quality image and natural colors. A strong point in Sony XBR65X850F specs is 6.0 Google Android ops system that features about 40 various apps. The...

Read More

Add TV to comparison

We didn't find anything to show here
Votes 4 4
Rating 4 4

Common

Product

Samsung QN65Q6FNA
Sony XBR65X850F

Model

QN65Q6FNA
XBR65X850F

Brand

Samsung
Sony

Rating

4.4 of 5
4.3 of 5

Reviews

533
185

General

Series

Q6F
X850F

Screen sizes in series

49, 55, 65, 75, 82
65, 75, 85

Display

Screen size, inch

65
65

4K/UHD

Full HD

Resolution, pixels

3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160

Display type

VA
IPS

Screen design

flat
flat

Display width, cm/in

142.85/56.24
142.85/56.24

Display height, cm/in

80.35/31.63
80.35/31.63

Display area, %

95.33
94.69

Display colors

1.07 billion
1.07 billion

Refresh rate, Hz

120
120

Aspect ratio

16:9
16:9

High dynamic range (HDR)

HDR10
HDR10

3D

3D

2D to 3D

has not
has not

Video file formats

AVI

WMV

MP4

MOV

Other

3GPP, MKV, TS, M2TS, WebM, ASF
MKV, WebM, M2TS

Video file codecs

DivX

H.265

H.264

H.263

MPEG-4

Other

Flash Video, VC-1, VP7, VP8, VP9
QuickTime, Xvid

Viewing angles

Horizontal, degrees

178
178

Vertical, degrees

178
178

Audio

Speakers

stereo
stereo

Speakers power, W

40
20

Dolby atmos

Dolby surround

DTS decoder

Audio file formats

MP3

WMA

WAV

AAC

AC3

FLAC

OGG

Other

ALAC, AIFF, APE, M4A, MIDI
MIDI, M4A, LPCM

Dimensions, weight and color

Colors

black
black

Width, cm/in

144.52/56.9
145/57.08

Height, cm/in

83.31/32.79
83.6/32.91

Depth, cm/in

5.59/2.2
5.2/2.04

Weight, kg/lbs

24.2/53.35
25.6/56.44

Width with stand, cm/in

144.52/56.9
145/57.08

Height with stand, cm/in

90.93/35.79
90/35.43

Depth with stand, cm/in

28.45/11.2
31.5/12.4

Weight with stand, kg/lbs

24.8/54.67
26.5/58.42

Connections

HDMI

4
4

USB

2
3

Component video input

0
0

Composite video input

1
1

VGA input

0
0

Optical digital audio output (S/PDIF)

1
1

Analog audio output (3.5 mm)

0
1

Ethernet (RJ45)

1
1

Wi-Fi

Wi-Fi 5GHz

Bluetooth

TV tuner

Analog

Digital

Ergonomics

VESA mount

VESA interface

400 x 400
300 x 300

Removable stand

Landscape/Portrait pivot

Accessories

Camera

Microphone

Internet movie streaming

Netflix

Hulu

Amazon video

HBO

Other

Vudu, GooglePlay
Vudu

Features

Remote control

Smart TV

Local dimming

Bluetooth audio streaming

Voice remote

Picture in picture

MHL-compatible

Parental control

Artificial Intelligence

Google assistant

Amazon alexa compatible

Mobile features

Mobile App

Recording features

Digital recording

Watch and record

Panel

Panel technology

Motion Rate
Motionflow XR

Backlight technology

Edge LED
Edge LED

Manufacturer

VA

Native refresh rate, Hz

240
120

Panel bit depth, bits

10
10

Pixel pitch, cm/in

0.037/0.014
0.037/0.014

Pixel density, ppi

68
68

Processor

Model

Quad-core
ARM Cortex-A53, Quad-core

Operating system

Operating system

Tizen 4.0
Android TV

Power

Power supply, V

100 - 120
100 - 120

Typical power consumption, W

85
150

Maximum power consumption, W

195
196

Standby power consumption, W

0.5
0.5

User manual

Manual

TVs HelpToChoose comparison rating

  • better
  • worse
  • 27.4
  • 24.1
  • 27.4Samsung QN65Q6FNA
  • 24.1Sony XBR65X850F

The Samsung QN65Q6FNA is better TV in this comparison. Check Samsung QN65Q6FNA price