Sony XBR65X900F vs Samsung 65NU8000

Samsung 65NU8000 vs Sony XBR65X900F — the Game of Technologies

Samsung 65NU8000 vs Sony XBR65X900F

The opposition of Sony XBR65X900F vs Samsung 65NU8000 is the battle of different engineering decisions implemented in the sturdy middle-class TVs. The Sony belongs to the series X900F appeared in 2018 and marked by the uniform blacks and excellent motion handling. Its Direct Led backlight provides smooth quality picture on all the display. The series for Samsung is NU8000, which has decent dynamic supported by the backlight flicker tech. It implements Edge Led, that might result in leveled brightness in some scenes. The viewing angle is a disadvantage of both series, which is common with the VA display matrix types.

Article navigation

Picture

Sony XBR65X900F produces a quality picture with edgy contrasts and deep colors. The image is crisp, with a perfect color array in SDR and juicy natural HDR. Meanwhile, the Samsung 65NU800 key feature is the vast color gamut and high brightness. The blacks are strong, while Sony’s are a bit deeper. However, the main point in placing Samsung 65NU8000 vs Sony XBR65X900F is the brightness and contrast distribution. Samsung features some tail blur in the active motion scenes, versus Sony keeping up with dynamics better, preserving the contrasts well. In the less active scenes, Samsung 65NU8000 provides smooth even bright picture supported by the local dimming technology.

Features & Performance

Samsung 65NU8000 has a Tizen OS that enables intuitive menu with a large distinct interface. However, setting up the TV takes time due to the numerous settings available for tweaking. To compare, Sony XBR65X900F has much faster setup, while the regular interaction with Android menu is more effort-taking. Both TVs support several streaming options, the Sony’s plus is the built-in Chromecast. Unlike Samsung 65NU8000, it also supports voice control apps like Alexa and Google Assistant.

Design & Build quality

Sony XBR65X900F has the expensive sleek touch, while its support legs are rather a matter of taste. Samsung 65NU8000 is marked by no-frame design making its shape seem even slimmer. It has a standard one-base stand. Its remote is plain and responsive, while Sony’s one has many buttons, well sorted by coloring and onset.

Samsung 65NU8000 & Cons

Pros:

  • Free Sync support for more gaming options.
  • Picture-in-picture allows switching to apps during ad broadcasting.
  • Decent audio speaker enabling the distinct dialogs.

Cons:

  • Built-in apps feature intrusive ads.
  • No 3D support.

Sony XBR65X900F Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Highly detailed picture in all Hi-Res video formats.
  • Perfect upscaling of DVD content to 4K.
  • Supports Dolby Surround format.

Cons:

  • No component input for older tuners.
  • Rather high consumption in both full-work and stand-by mode.

Samsung 65NU8000

Samsung 65NU8000 review

Dec 05, 2018

I decided to write this Samsung 65NU8000 review because Samsung series NU8000 (2018) provides great features such as Bluetooth audio streaming and voice remote. Samsung made probably one of the most ...

Read More

Add TV to comparison

We didn't find anything to show here
Votes 3 3
Rating 3 3

Common

Product

Sony XBR65X900F
Samsung 65NU8000

Model

XBR65X900F
65NU8000

Brand

Sony
Samsung

Rating

4.4 of 5
4.2 of 5

Reviews

285
558

General

Series

X900F
NU8000

Screen sizes in series

49, 55, 65, 75, 85
49, 55, 65, 75, 82

Display

Screen size, inch

65
65

4K/UHD

Full HD

Resolution, pixels

3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160

Display type

LCD
VA

Screen design

flat
flat

Display width, cm/in

142.85/56.24
142.85/56.24

Display height, cm/in

80.35/31.63
80.35/31.63

Display area, %

95.69
95.33

Display colors

1.07 billion
1.07 billion

Refresh rate, Hz

120
120

Aspect ratio

16:9
16:9

High dynamic range (HDR)

HDR10
HDR10

3D

3D

2D to 3D

has not
has not

Video file formats

AVI

WMV

MP4

MOV

Other

MKV, WebM, M2TS
3GPP, MKV, TS, M2TS, WebM, ASF

Video file codecs

DivX

H.265

H.264

H.263

MPEG-4

Other

QuickTime, Xvid
Flash Video, VC-1, VP7, VP8, VP9

Viewing angles

Horizontal, degrees

178
178

Vertical, degrees

178
178

Audio

Speakers

stereo
stereo

Speakers power, W

20
40

Dolby atmos

Dolby surround

DTS decoder

Audio file formats

MP3

WMA

WAV

AAC

AC3

FLAC

OGG

Other

MIDI, M4A, LPCM
ALAC, AIFF, APE, M4A, MIDI

Dimensions, weight and color

Colors

black
black

Width, cm/in

144.7/56.96
144.53/56.9

Height, cm/in

82.9/32.63
83.31/32.79

Depth, cm/in

6.9/2.71
5.59/2.2

Weight, kg/lbs

24.5/54.1
24.2/53.35

Width with stand, cm/in

144.7/56.96
144.53/56.9

Height with stand, cm/in

89.8/35.35
90.93/35.79

Depth with stand, cm/in

29.7/11.69
35.05/13.79

Weight with stand, kg/lbs

25.5/56.22
26.4/58.2

Connections

HDMI

4
4

USB

3
2

Component video input

0
0

Composite video input

1
1

VGA input

0
0

Optical digital audio output (S/PDIF)

1
1

Analog audio output (3.5 mm)

1
0

Ethernet (RJ45)

1
1

Wi-Fi

Wi-Fi 5GHz

Bluetooth

TV tuner

Analog

Digital

Ergonomics

VESA mount

VESA interface

300 x 300
400 x 400

Removable stand

Landscape/Portrait pivot

Accessories

Camera

Microphone

Internet movie streaming

Netflix

Hulu

Amazon video

HBO

Other

Vudu
Vudu, GooglePlay

Features

Remote control

Smart TV

Local dimming

Bluetooth audio streaming

Voice remote

Picture in picture

MHL-compatible

Parental control

Artificial Intelligence

Google assistant

Amazon alexa compatible

Mobile features

Mobile App

Recording features

Digital recording

Watch and record

Panel

Panel technology

Motionflow XR
Motion Rate

Backlight technology

Direct LED
Edge LED

Manufacturer

VA

Native refresh rate, Hz

240
240

Panel bit depth, bits

10
10

Pixel pitch, cm/in

0.037/0.014
0.037/0.014

Pixel density, ppi

68
68

Processor

Model

ARM Cortex-A53, Quad-core
Quad-core

Operating system

Operating system

Android 7.0 Nougat. Android 8.0 Oreo
Tizen 4.0

Power

Power supply, V

100 - 120
100 - 120

Typical power consumption, W

75

Maximum power consumption, W

271
195

Standby power consumption, W

0.5
0.3

User manual

Manual

TVs HelpToChoose comparison rating

  • better
  • worse
  • 26.5
  • 25.7
  • 26.5Sony XBR65X900F
  • 25.7Samsung 65NU8000

The Sony XBR65X900F is better TV in this comparison. Check Sony XBR65X900F price

Sony XBR65X900F competitors