Dec 05, 2018
I decided to write this Samsung 65NU8000 review because Samsung series NU8000 (2018) provides great features such as Bluetooth audio streaming and voice remote. Samsung made probably one of the most ...
Read MoreSamsung 65NU8000 vs LG 65UK6300PUE: Amazing Picture vs Practical Features
It’s exciting to compare the Samsung 65NU8000 vs LG 65UK6300PUE because both models were represented in the 2018 year and are products of well-known companies. The first device belongs to the NU8000 series, which conquered users with stunning high dynamic range and quick-working Smart TV. The second model is a part of a UK630 series, each representative has the LG ThinQ AI and Amazon Alexa. Samsung’s TV is regarded as an expensive unit, while the LG’s TV is affordable for middle-class users.
Picture
The LG 65UK6300PUE vs Samsung 65NU8000 comparison shows that the first model has a mediocre native contrast ratio. The black color is not saturated and it lacks uniformity. The Samsung’s device is able to produce deep black scenes; even the local dimming feature has a negligible impact on the contrast ratio. The 65NU8000’s viewing angle is very poor, while the 65UK6300PUE allows the black levels to stay accurate irrespective of angle.
Features & Performance
Both devices have ads within the content, but Samsung’s TV provides me with a bigger number of these annoying advertising than LG’s. The 65NU8000 is complemented by the HBO and Google Play, which are quickly launched and have no pauses in work. The 65UK6300PUE even can’t offer me these popular features. The voice control works not bad on both devices, but sometimes for LG, I have to repeat some commands twice. The sound is almost similar on both units.
Design & Build quality
The 65UK6300PUE doesn’t provide the cable management, so I can’t achieve a neat uncluttered finish. The 65NU8000 is supplemented with the cable management guides cut into the back. Despite the similar screen sizes, Samsung looks wider. The reason is a difference between the border’s dimensions (0.35" versus 0.75"). The build quality is amazing in both models. There are no creaks, unpleasant smell of a low-quality plastic, or gaps.
Samsung 65NU8000 Pros & Cons
Pros:
- All the connections are placed towards the side of the device, so I can easily reach them.
- The TV is great for gamers because of the low input lag.
Cons:
- A small offset from the center contributes to the change of colors and brightness.
- I can hear annoying ticking emanating during the first device’s working seconds.
LG 65UK6300PUE Pros & Cons
Pros:
- After updating I can launch the Netflix or Amazon with only one button click.
- Instruction is understandable and the installation took me not much time.
Cons:
- Some inputs are placed on the back side. It’s hard to reach them, while the TV is wall-mounted.
- The resident apps can be updated only after Internet connecting. I can’t delete most of them.
Samsung 65NU8000 review
LG 65UK6300PUE review
Sep 21, 2018
The LG 65UK6300PUE review deals with the mid-range model from the UK630 series that appeared on the market in 2017. Its 4K UHD TV’s video engine is able to upscale the low resolution. The Think...
Read MoreAdd TV to compare
We didn't find anything to show here
Common
Product
Samsung 65NU8000
LG 65UK6300PUE
Model
65NU8000
65UK6300PUE
Brand
Samsung
LG
Rating
4.2 of 5
4.0 of 5
Reviews
335
404
General
Series
NU8000
UK630
Screen sizes in series
49, 55, 65, 75, 82
43, 49, 55, 65
Display
Screen size, inch
65
65
4K/HDR
Full HD
Resolution, pixels
3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
Display type
VA
IPS
Screen design
flat
flat
Display width, cm/in
142,85/56,24
142,85/56,24
Display height, cm/in
80,35/31,63
80,35/31,63
Display area, %
95,33
91,61
Display colors
1.07 billion
1.07 billion
Refresh rate, Hz
120
60
Aspect ratio
16:9
16:9
High dynamic range (HDR)
HDR10
HDR10
3D
3D
2D to 3D
has not
has not
Video file formats
AVI
WMV
MP4
MOV
Other
3GPP, MKV, TS, M2TS, WebM, ASF
3GPP, MKV, TS, M2TS
Video file codecs
DivX
H.265
H.264
H.263
MPEG-4
Other
Flash Video, VC-1, VP7, VP8, VP9
QuickTime, VC-1, VP9, Flash Video
Viewing angles
Horizontal, degrees
178
178
Vertical, degrees
178
178
Audio
Speakers
stereo
stereo
Speakers power, W
40
20
Dolby atmos
Dolby surround
DTS decoder
Audio file formats
MP3
WMA
WAV
AAC
AC3
FLAC
OGG
Other
ALAC, AIFF, APE, M4A, MIDI
LPCM, RealAudio, aptX, HE-AAC
Dimensions, weight and color
Colors
black
black
Width, cm/in
144,53/56,9
146,81/57,79
Height, cm/in
83,31/32,79
85,34/33,6
Depth, cm/in
5,59/2,2
8,9/3,5
Weight, kg/lbs
24,2/53,35
20,6/45,42
Width with stand, cm/in
144,53/56,9
146,81/57,79
Height with stand, cm/in
90,93/35,79
91,7/36,1
Depth with stand, cm/in
35,05/13,79
26,92/10,59
Weight with stand, kg/lbs
26,4/58,2
21/46,3
Connections
HDMI
4
3
USB
2
2
Component video input
0
1
Composite video input
1
1
VGA input
0
0
Optical digital audio output (S/PDIF)
1
1
Analog audio output (3.5 mm)
0
1
Ethernet (RJ45)
1
1
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 5GHz
Bluetooth
TV tuner
Analog
Digital
Ergonomics
VESA mount
VESA interface
400 x 400
300 x 300
Removable stand
Landscape/Portrait pivot
Accessories
Camera
Microphone
Internet movie streaming
Netflix
Hulu
Amazon video
HBO
Other
Vudu, GooglePlay
Vudu
Features
Remote control
Smart TV
Local dimming
Bluetooth audio streaming
Voice remote
Picture in picture
MHL-compatible
Parental control
Artificial Intelligence
Google assistant
Amazon alexa compatible
Mobile features
Mobile App
Recording features
Digital recording
Watch and record
Panel
Panel technology
Motion Rate
TruMotion
Backlight technology
Edge LED
Direct LED
Manufacturer
LG Display
Native refresh rate, Hz
240
120
Panel bit depth, bits
10
10
Pixel pitch, cm/in
0,037/0,014
0,037/0,014
Pixel density, ppi
68
68
Processor
Model
Quad-core
Quad-core
Operating system
Operating system
Tizen 4,0
webOS 4,0
Power
Power supply, V
100 - 120
100 - 240
Typical power consumption, W
75
Maximum power consumption, W
195
150
Standby power consumption, W
0,3
0,5
TVs comparison rating
- 34.5Samsung 65NU8000
- 33LG 65UK6300PUE
The Samsung 65NU8000 is better TV in this comparison. Check Samsung 65NU8000 price
Top rated TV reviews
Latest TV comparisons
Popular TV comparisons
